Multiple search strategies were used to identify eligible studies. To synthesize the extant evaluation literature and assess the effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime. 2 BRIEF ABSTRACT 2.1 Backgroundįocused deterrence strategies, also known as “pulling levers” policing programs, have been increasingly implemented in the United States and other countries to reduce serious violent crime committed by gangs and other criminally active groups, recurring offending by highly active individual offenders, and crime and disorder problems generated by overt street-level drug markets. The review authors searched for studies up to October 2015. The growth of focused deterrence warrants more methodologically rigorous program evaluations and further exploration into the specific components of the strategy in order to improve our understanding of how the program reduces crime. However, despite the increase in eligible studies, no evaluations utilized a randomized controlled trial design. The number of studies included in the updated review is more than double the number of studies included in the previous iteration of the review. Practitioners and policy-makers should continue to implement focused deterrence programs to address serious crime problems. 1.5 What do the findings of this review mean?įindings from this review support the growing use of focused deterrence as a proactive crime reduction strategy. There is some evidence of the diffusion of crime control benefits. No studies found significant crime displacement effects into surrounding areas. 1.4.3 Does crime get displaced to other areas? DMI programs are most likely to suffer implementation problems which reduce effectiveness. Gang/group intervention programs generate the largest effects, followed by programs targeting high-risk individuals, with the smallest effects generated by drug market intervention (DMI) programs. 1.4.2 Do some programs work better than others? The largest reductions are generated by focused deterrence strategies that target criminally active gangs or groups, followed by programs that target individual chronic offenders and drug market interventions. The available evidence suggests an overall reduction in crime when focused deterrence strategies are used. 1.4 What are the main findings of this review? 1.4.1 Is focused deterrence an effective approach to reducing criminal offending among problem persons and groups? None of the identified studies used a randomized controlled trial design. Twenty-three studies were conducted in the United States and one in Scotland. All studies were published from 2001 to 2015. 1.3 What studies are included?Ī total of 24 studies of focused deterrence interventions were identified. All but one of the studies are from the United States. The review summarizes and analyzes results from 24 quasi-experimental evaluations of focused deterrence interventions, including 12 programs targeting criminally active gangs or groups, nine programs targeting open-air drug markets, and three programs targeting high-risk individual offenders. This Campbell systematic review examines the effects of focused deterrence on crime.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |